January 25th, 2012 |
A recent question we were asked concerned the expiration of the EB5 regional center pilot program in September 2012. The client was concerned that if he chooses a particular regional center program that was slow to fill-up he could risk the project not being fully funded by the end of the program.
This is an important question that raises a number of issues:-
- The EB5 visa regional center pilot program is due to expire in September 2012 unless it is extended or made permanent by the US Congress.
- Currently applications are being processed by The United States Citizenship and Immigration service (USCIS) in a time period that can vary from less than two months to over a year.
- This time period can be longer if an applicant receives a Request for Further Evidence Notice (RFE) by USCIS, particularly if USCIS need more information specifically on the chosen program.
Although there are a number of regional centers currently offering EB5 visa projects they are certainly not all created equally.
Some regional center programs are well proven, have a lengthy 100% track record and have extensive evidence of performance. In certain cases, applications have taken under two months to be approved by USCIS.
Others regional centers struggle to attract investors and raise concerns whether they will attract enough investor funding to be able to fully fund their project. Some of these regional centers need a very high numbers of investors, others only need a small number to fill up.
If a program fails to be funded prior to the expiration of the pilot program and cannot raise enough alternative funding at a difficult time on capital markets, there may be cause for concern that a project may not go ahead which places the EB5 visa investor in a potentially risky situation.
There are a number of reasons that programs can face problems filling their spaces, these include:-
• Their marketing or sales process
• An inherent problem with the project
• Is it simply not an attractive project
For further detailed information on the many EB5 visa regional center programs contact Which EB5 for independent and experienced advice on EB5 visa matters.
|
| |
Tags: eb5, eb5 regional center, EB5 visa, Immigration, pilot program, regional center pilot program, request for further evidence, RFE, uscis, Which EB5 Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 24th, 2012 |
A couple of weeks ago we heard from a particular family who were looking at the EB5 visa as their best method of obtaining permanent residency in the USA. They had a number of questions to ask and during the course of our conversation it became clear they had learnt about a particular EB5 visa program through friends in their home country.
The regional center in question had strong contacts with this particular country but was a new and unproven center with no record of visa approvals. Unproven centers maybe a concern given there is often little statistical information to factor into due diligence considerations.
As first generation immigrants we can understand why sometimes potential immigrants place emphasis on working with people who come from their home country, perhaps on the basis that they have experience of the journey they are planning to take. However, looking at the regional center project this family was considering it became clear that they had not been given all the information necessary to make a judgment.
Apart from having no track record the regional center had other critical issues.
• The project in question may or may not have been a viable business proposition, from an immigration perspective it needed to satisfy certain standards including creating approved jobs. Failure to do so could lead to eventual deportation from the USA.
• The project had an ambiguous exit strategy. This raised questions such as when or indeed if they were likely to see the return of the $500,000 they would need to invest to make their EB5 visa application.
• It is also interesting to compare current processing times between various regional centers. We are aware of one long-established regional center that currently is having applications approved in six weeks where a number of new small and un-established centers are still waiting for their I-526 applications to be approved over a year later!
It could take several years before an EB5 visa holder realizes that they have made a bad decision in their choice of a regional center project.
Assuming an applicant does get approval for the visa it could be at least two years before they become aware of a problem and later find they have not been approved for the all-important I-829 (removal of conditions) petition. (This is required after two years and approval is dependent on the funds being invested in accordance with the original application and the creation of ten jobs as laid out under USCIS requirements)
In some cases it could be even longer, maybe five years, maybe ten years or longer before investors realize they may not see the return of some or all of their $500,000 investment. Bottom line, it is critical to get independent and impartial EB5 visa information when considering this visa.
|
| |
Tags: due diligence, eb5, EB5 visa, exit strategy, I-526, I-829, immigrant, immigrants, impartial information, permanent residency, regional center, removal of conditions, track record, USA, uscis, WhichEB5 Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 18th, 2012 |
There have been a number of articles in recent weeks about the job creation aspects of the EB5 visa program.
The visa can require applicants to invest $500,000 through what are termed regional center programs. Over 200 regional centers have been approved by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS).
In straightforward terms, each $500,000 investment requires the creation of ten jobs; these jobs are generally required to be in what is termed a targeted employment area (TEA).
The accusations relate to whether the jobs in certain programs are actually in true targeted employment areas. If they are not, the EB5 visa applicant could potentially find themselves in some difficulty two years later when it comes time to have conditions removed from their green card, I-829 petition time.
It is believed that USCIS are looking into some of the accusations.
The two year date is important as the permanent residency (green card), if approved, is initially granted on a conditional basis for a two-year period. At the end of that period the applicant applies for an I-829 petition and will need to show that the funds were utilized as agreed and ten jobs meeting the required criteria were created.
The issue of failure to create approved jobs has already seen a number of I-829 denials; this could lead to the eventual deportation of the EB5 visa holders.
This issue does illustrate just how important it is to carry out detailed due diligence before choosing which particular regional center program is right for all your needs. It is simply not safe enough to take at face value assurances that may be given by regional centers. It is too late to find out there is a problem after you have invested and obtained your conditional visa.
If you are planning to move to The USA on the EB5 visa, contact Chase Brodsky of WhichEB5 who will be happy to set-up a free consultation for you. Which EB5 have a 100% success record with EB5 visa immigrants.
+Stephen Parnell 
|
| |
Tags: due diligence, eb5, EB5 visa, gerrymandering, green cars, I-829, job creation, regional centers, TEA, uscis Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 16th, 2012 |

How long does an EB5 I-526 petition take?
Continuing our series on questions about the facts behind the EB5 visa, today we consider a question many applicants feel to be important when looking at regional center options.
Although The United States Citizenship and Immigration service (USCIS) regularly publish guidelines on the processing time for I-526 petitions, there continues to be differences between processing times for different regional center programs.
In the last month we have seen examples of I-526 petitions granted in less than two months for a client of one regional center and another petition for a client from a different center that took over a year. If you have a limited amount of time to get your EB5 visa approval you need to know which regional centers are faster than others.
In many ways this does not surprise us as it has become clear that some regional centers are far more in tune with USCIS guidelines than others as far as their paperwork and business plans which are clearly in line with the latest USCIS requirements.
If you are considering the EB5 visa, and speed of processing is an important issue for you, it is important to keep in mind that some regional center publicity material and some of their sales agents are not being accurate in their claims about processing times for their programs. Claims have been made which are contrary to reality.
Many regional centers make outlandish claims about how long it takes them to get an I-526 approval but very few can actually prove they enjoy consistently fast approvals; ask us for details of these centers so you can enjoy these genuinely fast approvals.
To find out the latest information about the processing times for EB5 visas, and the positive and negative aspects of various regional center programs contact Chase Brodsky at Which EB5
|
| |
Tags: eb5, EB5 visa, I-526, regional center, uscis, visa, Which EB5 Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 11th, 2012 |
Could the EB5 visa investment requirement of $500,000 be increased?
Ongoing uncertainty in many countries throughout the world has resulted in increased interest in immigration to the USA.
All over the globe political concerns including the uncertainty in Korea after the death of Kim Jong II, environmental concerns such as natural disasters in Japan and economic concerns such as the problems in the Euro zone make the USA seem an ideal oasis of calm by comparison.
The fact that recent USA labor figures show unemployment finally starting to decline emphasize that the US is beginning to put its problems behind it. The USA has many advantages including its transparent political system and world leading education system which have made it the preferred choice for so many families seeking to improve their family’s quality of life.
For many, the preferred route to achieve this has been the EB5 visa, it is one of the few readily available options that allows an entire family (applicant, spouse and unmarried children under 21) to get permanent residence in the USA in a relatively quick time.
Currently the EB5 visa requires an investment of $500,000 in what the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) terms a “Regional Center”. However, there has been commentary by certain leading political figures that the $500,000 investment, which has not been altered for over ten years, could be increased in September 2012. If you are considering the EB5 immigrant investor visa as the best method to achieve permanent residency in The USA, you may be interested in a significant point made by Senator Grassley of Iowa, who is the ranking member of the Senate Committee on The Judiciary. In his statement on reauthorizing the EB5 regional center pilot program, Senator Grassley made a number of points including:-
“I think it’s important to consider whether the dollar amounts should be raised. They have remained at $500,000 and $1 million since the early 1990s.”
The increased popularity of the EB5 visa makes such an increase a possibility, and in the event of such an announcement, it is likely there will be a rush of applicants to beat an increase. Such a rush would have consequences in terms of supply and demand of places. In theory there are over 200 regional centers offering programs qualifying for the EB5 visa, however, currently many of them are inactive.
Of those regional centers currently offering projects, a significant number have very limited experience and/or potentially very speculative programs which show only a few previous investors.
Many potential EB5 visa applicants require programs that can point to an unblemished record, including the following:-
1. A good record of applications progressing through USCIS system in a timely manner, (times can vary from under six months to well over a year).
2. A 100% record of I-526 success.
3. A 100% record of I-829 success. At this stage conditions are removed from the green card.
4. The return of the full $500,000 within a reasonable time period. Many feel this needs to be between four to six years.
Despite lavish claims made by a number of regional centers at the beginning of 2012 it seems that only one regional center will have fully met all these criteria. (Further factual information can be obtained from WhichEB5).
It is important to be aware that in 2011 a number of regional centers programs were investigated by USCIS and later closed. In other cases families had I-829’s rejected. It is important to be very careful when choosing a regional center program and look beyond the all too typical sales hype and false promises.
For those looking at the EB5 visa as the best route to settle your family in the USA, but wanting the widest possible choice of regional center programs, there may be regional centers, which although not fulfilling all the four criteria above, may be of interest depending upon your own specific requirements. Arrange a free briefing through WhichEB5 now and you can be updated on the options available and the latest news about the EB5 visa program.
Contact Chase Brodsky on +1-561-771-1330 or via email at chase@whicheb5.com – Request full details of EB5 Visa programs
|
| |
Tags: committee on the judiciary, eb5, EB5 visa, green card, I-526, I-829, immigrant investor, Immigration, immigration to the usa, investor visa, japan, kim jong ii, Korea, natural disasters in japan, permanent residence, regional center, regional centers, residency in the usa, senate committee, Senator Grassley, united states citizenship and immigration service, USA, uscis, WhichEB5 Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 10th, 2012 |
Recently I received a question from a potential EB5 client asking for information on how he might find a regional center that did not charge an administration fee.
My reply centered on the client’s motivation, aside from the obvious, to choose a regional center project based upon a lack of, or a very low, administration fee. The response I received intrigued me so I thought I should share it with our readers and offer some thoughts. Here is the client’s response:
“Where in official docs it is mentioned that investment beneficiaries can or may charge rather variable amounts for their admin fees?
I thought it goes without saying that the investment money makes it possible that all their needs are covered by investment itself”.
Whenever I see a question from an EB5 client that is confused it offers a chance to try to clear-up potential future confusion by offering a little commentary.
Keep in mind that the decision to charge an administration fee by the regional center is their decision alone. The USCIS do not have any involvement in the negotiation of these fees. The fees charged by a regional center for participation in one of their projects is typically governed by a) the regional centers want to recoup some of the costs of putting the project together, b) to offset some of the regional centers fees for legal documents, marketing and other expenses and c) market driven forces. i.e. the need to be competitive in the EB5 marketplace.
From feedback of previous clients, I can say that I have never heard from anyone that they were going to use the amount of an administration fee (or the total lack thereof) as criteria for the choice of regional center project.
Typical administration fees charged by EB5 regional centers range from $35,000 to $60,000. Keep in mind that in addition to these fees you will incur legal fees of your own for filing of your I-526 petition, consular processing or adjustment of status and filing of your I-829 petition to remove conditions (after approx.. two years). Legal fees do vary based upon your choice of EB5 attorney. It is imperative that you engaged an experienced EB5 attorney NOT simply an experienced immigration attorney.
More about this tomorrow when we discuss “Consular Processing” procedures and the need for expert advice before attending a consular interview.
+Stephen Parnell 
|
| |
Tags: consular processing, eb5, EB5 Attorney, regional center, uscis Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 9th, 2012 |
Encouraging economic data from The USA was contained in the latest jobless figures which showed the jobless rate falling to a three-year low, with an extra 212,000 people finding jobs. (Some credit going to the EB5 visa program). These figures have helped drive the unemployment rate down to 8.5% but a number of politicians have stressed that more needs to be done.
With the Presidential elections due later in the year, there is substantive political pressure to further reduce the jobless figures and the EB5 visa remains one method that effectively creates new jobs for American workers and does NOT have a cost to the American tax payer.
The EB5 visa works on the basis that immigrants to the USA can be granted permanent residency status for themselves, their spouse and their unmarried children under 21 in return for investing $500,000 in what is termed a Regional Center program. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) has to date approved over 200 of these centers.
The performance of the regional centers has varied considerably; some have already created thousands of jobs benefiting the US economy, where others have collapsed achieving very little and potentially losing some or all of the investor funds.
For those of you planning to move to the USA and seeking independent impartial advice on the various regional center options the EB5 regional center program is expected to be extended at some stage during 2012, although there has been some discussion as to whether the required investment level may be raised above the current $500,000 level.
For more information on how the EB5 visa can obtain permanent residency in the USA for you and your family please contact Chase Brodsky on +1-561-771-1330 or via email at Chase@WhichEB5.com or register for EB5 visa information here.
|
| |
Tags: american, eb5, EB5 visa, immigrants, regional centers, USA, uscis Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 5th, 2012 |

EB5 Visa Exit Strategy (or) I Want My Money Back
An important aspect of investing in a regional center program is that the investor should have a well-defined exit strategy. However, the exit strategy cannot run afoul of the legal requirement under the EB-5 program that the investment be placed at risk without a guarantee; i.e., that there be no disguised redemption option to cash out before the conditions have been removed from the investor’s conditional permanent residence; and that the investment not be a loan disguised as an investment. The investor generally wants the fastest and easiest possible exit from the investment. However, one must bear in mind that USCIS’s policy requires that the investment be in place at least until the investor has removed the conditions from his conditional permanent residence. It is a legal requirement that the funds be placed at risk of partial or complete loss, just as any real business investment would be.
Tomorrow we conclude our latest series of: An Open Letter from an Experienced EB-5 Visa Attorney.
|
| |
Tags: attorney, conditional permanent residence, EB-5 Visa, exit strategy, uscis Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 4th, 2012 |

The Immigration Procedures under the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Pilot Program
We begin the EB5 immigration process with a free consultation, by phone or at our office. During that consultation we will discuss the general aspects of the regional Center Program as well as the basic requirements to qualify as an investor. Once you retain us by signing an agreement for representation and paying the retainer, we will forward an extensive checklist to gather basic information on your particular circumstances and the legality of the investment funds.
The investor must invest $500,000 in a USCIS-designated regional center program before we can file the I-526 Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur. It is crucial for obtaining approval of the initial I-526 petition that the invested funds were legally earned. This evidence should include copies of at least 5 years of tax returns, proof of the employment or business activity from which it was earned, documentation from any recent transactions from which the money was derived, such as the sale of land or from an equity line on a property.
Alternatively, if you received the funds as a gift, then we need to present information on how the person, from whom you received the gift, earned the money. We file the I-526 petition, and it takes approximately 7-9 months for the I-526 petition to be decided. The processing time can vary from one regional center to another and from one investor to another. When the I-526 petition is approved, if you are already living in the U.S. in non-immigrant visa status, you may adjust your status to conditional permanent residence in the U.S.
If you are not currently living in the U.S. in non-immigrant visa status, then you must complete the immigrant visa process through the U.S. consulate, which typically takes 4-6 months at most consulates. Adjustment of status typically takes less than 3 months. Consular immigrant visa processing is also available to those present in the U.S. with non-immigrant visa status, and would typically come into play when less time is left on the current visa status than the usual processing time for the I-526 petition, and the extension of the visa status is looking uncertain.
Once you successfully complete either of these two processes, you will have a two-year conditional permanent residence. During the final 90 days of that two-year period, you must file the I-829 petition to remove the conditions from your permanent residence. As part of that process, we must show that you have maintained your investment, and we have to present proof to USCIS from the regional center that it has brought about the creation of at least 10 jobs per immigrant investor, as presented in the I-526 petition. The number of jobs created as calculated with the help of an economist’s model, would consist of a combination of direct, indirect, and induced jobs. This process currently takes about 6-9 months.
One other point to bear in mind is that the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program, as a pilot program, has functioned on a test basis since its creation, and so Congress has needed to renew the program every few years, typically every 3 to 5 years. Most recently, the program was set to expire on September 30, 2008. After several short-term extensions, on October 28, 2009, the program was extended for three years to September 30, 2012. On the positive side, in the past, Congress has used the renewal process to reform the program in ways that have improved its functionality. On the negative side, Congress typically procrastinates until the last minute with extending the program, which creates uncertainty and nervousness about whether there will be a temporary lapse in, or even a permanent demise of, the program. Nevertheless, no matter how dysfunctional the program was at any point when it was up for renewal, Congress has not let the IIPP lapse.
In the past, Congress has renewed the IIPP at times when the program was, in effect, not functioning and existed in law but not in practice. Now, the program is actually fulfilling its function by bringing billions of dollars of foreign capital into the U.S. and bringing about the creation of hundreds of thousands of new jobs for U.S. workers, particularly at a time when the economy is down, unemployment is high, and banks are refusing to loan sufficient capital to carry out large-scale construction and business expansion projects. Capital from EB-5 investors is filling this large gap, and often on terms more favorable to U.S. businesses than bank loans would be. The IIPP is, in effect, an economic stimulus program that costs the U.S. taxpayer practically nothing.
Another factor in the renewal of the IIPP is that, since the last renewal of the program, the number of regional centers has ballooned from 18 to over 200. The regional centers were previously located in less than 18 states, but they are now located in 39 states, plus the District of Columbia and Guam. That means that that many more Members of Congress have one or more regional centers in their district. For those who do not yet have a regional center in their district, there is the potential for an existing regional center to expand into their district or for a new regional center to be created in their district in the future.
Certainly, no one has a crystal ball to predict the ultimate fate of the IIPP, but the reasons that Members of Congress have for renewing or making the program permanent are greater than they have ever been in the past. The program is working, albeit not as quickly and efficiently as it could or should, to bring in foreign capital and create jobs for U.S. workers at a time when the U.S.’s economic condition is weak. Moreover, the economic benefits of the program are now being distributed more evenly across the U.S. to the districts of more Members of Congress who will be voting on whether to extend the program or make it permanent. The reasons for renewing or making the program permanent are greater in number than those against, and the current economic conditions in the U.S. make the reasons in favor even more compelling, especially when the opinion polls of U.S. voters indicate that, in upcoming elections in 2012, they plan to hold politicians accountable for what they have done, or have not done, to foster job creation.
What would be the effect of a lapse in the IIPP? In order for the sunset (expiration) of the program not to affect the EB-5 investor’s case, both the I-526 petition and the I-485 adjustment of status or the application for an immigrant visa through consular processing must be approved prior to the sunset of the program. If the investor’s I-485 adjustment of status or application for an immigrant visa has been approved prior to the sunset, then the investor will be able to proceed to live in the U.S. in conditional permanent resident status and will be eligible to apply to remove the conditions from such status regardless of whether the program has been extended.
Just a reminder:
My name is Anthony Olson, and I am a lawyer who operates an immigration law practice with offices in Sarasota and Fort Myers, Florida. The following information includes my analysis of certain aspects of the Regional Center program that you should consider in seeking to optimize your chances of success in the United States immigration process. Also included is a discussion detailing the process of applying for permanent residence in the U.S. through the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Pilot Program.
Please understand that any information contained herein do not constitute legal advice, nor investment advice, nor a due diligence report of any kind, and that your receipt of this information does not by itself create an attorney-client relationship.
Tomorrow we will look at: Exit Strategy
|
| |
Tags: adjustment of status, congress, eb-5, eb-5 immigrant investor pilot program, free consultation, I-485, I-526, IIPP, permanent residence, regional center, uscis Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
January 2nd, 2012 |
Today is part 3 of our Open Letter from an experienced EB5 Visa Attorney:
The job creation requirement
The job creation methodology is the single most important aspect to consider when examining regional center programs. In order for an investor to qualify for removal of the conditions from his or her conditional permanent residence, USCIS must be convinced, based on calculations presented by an economist using a reasonable methodology that sufficient jobs have been created, that is, 10 jobs per investor in the program.
Different regional center programs use different methodologies for calculating the number of jobs created. Some regional centers calculate the creation of “direct jobs” based on projections of the number of employees that tenants can employ per square footage of space depending on the use to which the tenant places the rented space, such as retail sales, office, light industrial, or warehouse, among others. The resulting number of employees/jobs is plugged into the economist’s model to produce the calculation of direct and indirect jobs created by virtue of the business consuming goods and services in the local economy.
Other regional centers determine the job creation by calculating all indirect job creation with an expenditure-based economic model. An example of this would be a regional center that makes loans to local and state governments, which use the funds as their matching funds in order to qualify for federal development grants to carry out construction and renovation of infrastructure to create and expand industrial parks and transportation/warehousing centers. The job creation figure is then calculated using a multiplier times the total amount of money spent on construction and renovation, including not only the regional center project’s loan funds but also the federal grant money.
Under the expenditure-based, indirect job creation methodology, the calculation of the job creation is much simpler. It is a matter of multiplying the total amount of money spent by the multiplier under the economist’s model. USCIS might be interested to verify the amount of money actually spent under the terms of the project, but there is no head count for determining the number of direct jobs created, since there are no direct jobs in the calculation, only indirect jobs.
Tomorrow we will cover: Consider factors that could keep the project from fulfilling the job creation requirement
|
| |
Tags: attorney, due diligence report, EB-5 Visa, investment advice, job creation, regional center, uscis Posted in Immigration | No Comments » |
|